Microsoft Antitrust Case

Management/org. | 12 pages | 15-03-2006 | Format : | Note : Non noté |

PRIX : 3.60€ |

Résumé

In July 2001, the court rejected judge Jackson's breakup order which meant to divide Microsoft firm into two parts. But seven judges said that Microsoft didn't have right to put whatever features or schedules into its operating system, and at the same time, violated measures of the Sherman Antitrust Act by adding an internet browser into Windows. The question is to know when a firm can add new features to an operating system. The Court of Appeals answered that it depends on each case that it will see if it helps or hurts consumers. This incomplete rule made by the court doesn't resolve the issue. Moreover, Microsoft has to stop making its partners sign contracts with exclusivity rule, as the company did with AOL Time Warner. But we have to consider that Windows' monopoly has created a standard that helps the rest of the software industry, but at the same time, thwarts competition. Maybe the firm would apply new rules and measures if there were a risk that the court decides to reconsider a breakup ...

Recommandations

Du même auteur

Nouveautés dans la rubrique Management/org.

Les plus visités dans la matière Management/org.