Résumé
On August 5th, 1981, President Reagan fired 11,359 striking air traffic controllers who had ignored his order to return to work. It might seem utterly mad to a French audience because since May 25th, 1864, the Loi Ollivier has authorised the "right to be on strike". Indeed, the French legal system over protects employees from dismissal or hiring. For instance, in 2005 the former La Samaritaine employees received roughly 5 years salary in compensation for an illegal dismissal. It emphasizes that each country has its own point of view concerning job demonstrations because of its own history.
This was the case for the First Job Contract and the March 2006 riots that caused a lot of ink to flow in the French and international press. This profusion of articles gives us a huge range of points of view about this situation. Through a selection of articles aiming at giving information to American, British and French audiences, we could figure out that both natives and foreigners can be critical of the French predicament.
Summary:
Introduction
I) Americans thought the March 2006 riots raised a more serious issue
1/ France requires a reform on its employment policy
2/ French people: a particular state of mind
II) According to French people, the First Job Contract had been a fiasco which set off the 2006 riots
1/ French people took First Job Contract the wrong way
2/ The First Job Contract would have been modified
Conclusion