Résumé
Essay on the pacific regulation of the disputes. Today, the sources are vast when we refer to the regulation of disputes within international law. Treaties, conventions and supranational organizations are such numerous that we may seem lost when it deals with pacific settlement of conflicts, that is to say the exit (without the use of force) of a dispute situation between States, for economic or territorial reasons for example. This impression is reinforced when we know that the parties in dispute can choose between all the means to regulate it, according to their own interests. How can it be made so that force is not used to settle disputes between States? What is the actual influence of such means? Do they always make parties reach a pacific regulation of their dispute?
Outline:
Introduction
I) Diplomatic means
A. Negotiations, good offices and inquiries
B. Mediation and conciliation
II) Adjudication means
A. Arbitration
B. Judicial decisions
III) The UN security council
A. Recommendations
B. Binding resolutions
Conclusion